Dave Meltzer Issues A Lengthier Statement After Coming Under Fire For Peyton Royce Comments
Wrestling reporter Dave Meltzer caused quite a storm on Twitter after comments he made about WWE Superstar Peyton Royce's appearance resurfaced. Now, he's released a more in-depth statement on the matter...
Dave Meltzer received a lot of backlash after comments he made about Peyton Royce's appearance on a recent podcast resurfaced.
In case you missed the hullabaloo, Meltzer said he felt the SmackDown LIVE Superstar was more attractive when she was on NXT, and mentioned her being "lighter" before she moved up to the main roster. Although he claims this was a reference to her breast enhancement surgery and not her weight, his remarks understandably drew a lot of heat.
Dave did apologise directly to Peyton over Twitter, but has now released a longer statement via The Wrestling Observer.
“I ended up being in the eye of the storm this week based on comments that I made on Wrestling Observer Radio last week. For those who defended me, thanks. But I was wrong the way I worded things. Yes, things were taken out of context and the meaning espoused to what I said wasn’t what I meant. Even saying that, I was still wrong and apologized, actually immediately for it, to Peyton Royce. It was sincere. I knew the fact I apologized and sincerely felt bad wasn’t going to matter. And I know many felt I made a big mistake in doing so. But this was not a political decision, it was a decision based on my own feeling of right and wrong, and I was wrong.
It’s a very tricky issue because I hate objectifying women or men based on looks while covering a business that is so heavily based on looks and bodies and where judgments are made. It’s really difficult because this is a business where cosmetic look plays a gigantic factor in who gets pushed and who doesn’t. It’s the nature of the entertainment business. To ignore that fact would really be not doing a part of my job. But others do the same job and I’ve been lucky enough to be a major player, and thus under a heavier microscope. But I still shouldn’t have said what I said. It is a difficult balancing act to be honest in analysis, but that’s not an excuse. We all make mistakes and all you can do is learn from them. I’ve learned from this one. It won’t happen again.”
What do you guys think about this whole situation? Has it been blown out of proportion, or was Meltzer way out of line?